🗓️ 07112025 1441
Core Concept:
- Specialized reverse_proxy with API-specific features
- Authentication, rate limiting, request/response transformation
- API composition (aggregates multiple service calls)
- Single entry point for microservices architectures
Why It Matters
- Single entry point for all API clients (web, mobile, third-party)
- Reduces client complexity by handling cross-cutting concerns centrally
- Enables microservices by abstracting service topology from clients
- Enforces policies consistently across all APIs
When to Use
- Microservices architecture with multiple backend services
- Need unified authentication/authorization across services
- Want to aggregate multiple service calls into single client request
- Need API versioning and deprecation management
- Require protocol translation (REST to gRPC, HTTP to WebSocket)
- Want centralized rate limiting and throttling
- Need API analytics and monitoring
When Not to Use
- Monolithic application with single backend (use simple reverse_proxy)
- Internal-only APIs with no external access (simpler routing sufficient)
- Performance-critical paths where latency matters most (direct service calls)
- Very simple API with no cross-cutting concerns
Trade-offs
Benefits:
- Decouples clients from microservices (service discovery abstracted)
- Reduces round trips (request aggregation)
- Centralized policy enforcement (auth, rate limiting)
- Protocol translation (REST ↔ gRPC ↔ SOAP)
- API versioning and backward compatibility
- Request/response transformation
- Simplified client code
Drawbacks:
- Additional latency (extra hop + processing)
- Potential single point of failure
- Can become bottleneck under high load
- Risk of becoming "god service" with too much logic
- Increased deployment complexity
- Requires careful capacity planning
Key Distinctions
API Gateway vs Reverse Proxy:
- API Gateway: API-aware, transforms requests, aggregates responses, enforces API policies
- Reverse Proxy: Protocol-agnostic, simple forwarding, caching, load balancing
- Gateway built on top of reverse proxy with API-specific features
API Gateway vs Service Mesh:
- API Gateway: Edge proxy, single entry point, north-south traffic
- Service Mesh: Sidecar proxies, service-to-service, east-west traffic
- Gateway handles external traffic; mesh handles internal traffic
- Often used together in microservices
This builds on reverse_proxy by adding API management features. Compare with backend_for_frontend which creates specialized gateways per client type.
Common Patterns
Request Aggregation
Gateway calls multiple microservices, combines responses into single response for client.
Client Request: GET /api/user-profile/123
Gateway Actions:
- Call UserService: GET /users/123
- Call OrderService: GET /users/123/orders
- Call PreferencesService: GET /users/123/preferences
- Combine into single JSON response
Client receives: Aggregated user profile in one request
Protocol Translation
Gateway translates between client protocol (REST) and internal protocol (gRPC).
API Versioning
Gateway routes requests to different service versions based on URL or header.
Common Pitfalls
Gateway becoming too smart: Avoid business logic in gateway. Keep it focused on cross-cutting concerns. Business logic belongs in services.
Synchronous aggregation blocking: If gateway aggregates 5 services sequentially, slowest service blocks entire response. Use parallel calls with timeouts.
Quick Reference
Popular API Gateway Solutions
| Solution | Type | Strengths | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kong | Self-hosted | Plugin ecosystem, OSS | Flexible API management |
| AWS API Gateway | Managed | AWS integration, serverless | AWS-native apps |
| Apigee | Managed | Enterprise features, analytics | Large-scale APIs |
| Tyk | Self-hosted | GraphQL, OSS | Developer-focused |
| KrakenD | Self-hosted | High performance, stateless | High-throughput APIs |
| Azure API Management | Managed | Azure integration | Azure-native apps |
| Zuul | Self-hosted | Netflix stack integration | Spring Boot apps |
Core Features
Authentication & Authorization:
- API key validation
- JWT token verification
- OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect
- mTLS
Traffic Management:
- Rate limiting per client/API
- Request throttling
- Circuit breaking
- Retry logic
Request/Response Handling:
- Header injection/removal
- Request/response transformation
- Protocol translation
- Request aggregation
Observability:
- Request logging
- Metrics collection
- Distributed tracing
- API analytics
Configuration Example (Kong)
services:
- name: user-service
url: http://user-service:8080
routes:
- name: user-route
paths:
- /api/users
plugins:
- name: rate-limiting
config:
minute: 100
policy: local
- name: jwt
- name: cors
- name: request-transformer
config:
add:
headers:
- X-Gateway-Version:1.0
Request Flow
Client → API Gateway → [Auth] → [Rate Limit] → [Transform] → Microservice(s)
↓
[Cache Check]
↓
[Aggregate if needed]
↓
Client ← [Response Transform] ← API Gateway ← Microservice(s)